Let it buckle, let it bend ([info]amarynth) wrote,
@ 2007-12-18 10:01:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current location:Work
Current mood: lazy
Current music:Arcade Fire, "Neighbourhood #3 / Power Out"
Entry tags:music, the year that was

2007 - year of the clusterfuck
THE TEN BEST ALBUMS OF 2007

It’s been a fairly average year for music. The biggest news has been the slew of reunions, with acts as diverse as the Verve, the Police, Led Zeppelin, Rage against the Machine and the Smashing Pumpkins getting together to earn a few dollars and, if we’re (un)lucky, record a new album. Musical innovation has been mostly limited to marketing, with Radiohead’s decision to release their new album for free causing waves and fattening wallets around the world. There haven’t been many new bands on the scene either, with most of the albums to make my list being second or third efforts from bands that appeared on the scene two to five years ago. But when the year was good, it was very good. Here are the ten most good (or ‘goodest’, to satisfy you grammar Nazis) occasions.

#10. Yours Truly Angry Mob – Kaiser Chiefs.

The Kaiser Chiefs may be in danger of becoming a British Hooty and the Blowfish, but they deserve credit for making their pub rock interesting and punkish in a way that songs about getting fish and chips and going to football games shouldn’t be. This mob doesn’t really seem that angry at all.

#9. Icky Thump – White Stripes.

At first this album was a pretty major disappointment for me, with nothing to match the ‘grab-you-by-the-throat’ appeal of previous Stripes works like ‘Seven Nation Army’. But on repeated listenings it reveals it’s not only equal, but actually superior to Get Behind Me Satan, just as irreverent and significantly more musically together.

#8. Grinderman – Grinderman.

Nick Cave is famous for reshuffling his band like a pack of cards, but this time more than just the names of the backing musicians have changed. The band itself has been renamed, and it’s largely abandoned bombastic piano-based doom rock in favour of scratchy guitar-based garage rock. One finds oneself wondering if one is being subject to a rather elaborate joke, but regardless, when it works, it transcends the novelty value, and when it rocks, it rocks fairly hard.

#7. Carnavas – Silversun Pickups.

Similar to Death Cab for Cutie but not nearly as over-hyped, Silversun Pickups are a fairly obscure Indie rock group from California who frequently flirt with emo without quite getting there, but don’t let their not being a thousand miles from My Chemical Romance prevent them from coming up with some extremely charming and occasionally poignant sixties-influenced guitar music.

#6. What’s The Time, Mr Wolf? – The Noisettes.

Another overlooked band, but British, not American, the Noisettes feature a soul-influenced lead singer flanked by a pair of shaggy-haired indie rock guys. Drawing equally from the Supremes and My Bloody Valentine, their first album combines a cheery upbeat vocal style with skidding guitar drones and grim lyrical matter in a manner that’s both thought provoking and toe tapping.

#5. A Weekend in the City – Bloc Party.

Another Anglo-African group, Bloc Party owe more to Joy Division than Diana Ross. Weekend is their second album and is rather less murky than its predecessor, with sharper guitars and drums, and even injections of electronica. The album is something of a ‘state of the nation’ work that addresses the chaos of modern British life, dwelling on immigration, terrorism and corruption in a way that’s relevant far outside the UK.

#4. An End Has A Start – Editors.

A journalist once said to me, rule number one is never say anything bad about editors. But even without this sage advice, I wouldn’t have much bad to say about this album. It’s not as good as their debut album, which flattened all around it like some post-punk nuclear bomb, but it’s telling that Editors in a lull are better than many other bands on an upswing. It’s a bit more political, a bit more piano-y, a bit less Joy Division-y and a bit more Muse-y. These guys are going places fast and their third album might yet give them the accolades they deserve. Now if only they would get with the times and call themselves ‘The Editors’

#3. In Rainbows – Radiohead.

Amidst all the flak concerning this album’s label-less, money-free method of release, discussion of its musical virtues has been pretty muted. Now it can’t be denied marketing is as much a part of the game as composition but nor can it be denied that this is, when the dust has settled, a good album. It owes a heavy debt to Can and DJ Shadow, but the basic formula might well be to make an electronic album that sounds like it was recorded on some godforsaken Yorkshire at the middle of the night in winter – even when the guitars and synths are swarming all over the place, the prevailing sound can only be described as ‘bleak’. Perhaps it has something to do with Thom Yorke’s strained falsetto vocals, which are dominating the songs more than they have ever done. It’s quite astounding that a band originally written off as a one hit wonder are still innovating fifteen years after their debut.

#2. Zeitgeist – Smashing Pumpkins.

It sounds like a formula for disaster. A band that was clearly out of artistic energy reforms seven years later with only two of its original members. Surely such an album is destined to suck in a legendarily bad way. Many critics fell for this compelling narrative but they can’t have listened to this album, because it cooks like a handful of bullets on a Mongolian hot plate. One can only conclude from the evidence that Billy Corgan was right all along – he really was the sole artistic force behind the Pumpkins (which fails to explain why his solo album blew so hard). But whatever its genesis, Zeitgeist is as undeniably good as a hundred dollar bill coated in chocolate. It’s energetic, intelligent and listenable – even danceable – in a way that the Pumpkins never consistently managed.

#1. Neon Bible – Arcade Fire.

Arcade Fire marked themselves as something special from the moment I first heard ‘Haiti’ in a record store in early 2005. Their first album was excellent, their second album is even better. The band have, it seems, gone beyond the fairly personal meditations of Funeral, their debut, taken a look at the world, basically hated what they saw, and composed an album that lays that out. The perspective switches from the personal to the global and back again, but the mood is one of despair, disillusionment and mourning for an innocence they never knew they had until it was lost. The only downside is that, with music this heartfelt and negative, the odds for a third album are not good, simply because they’ll probably have all topped themselves at this rate.

So, there it is. Do you agree? Disagree? Any conspicuous ommissions or foolish inclusions on my part? Let's get some kind of discussion going here, my bad pennies.




(15 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]cactus_cat
2007-12-17 09:33 pm UTC (link)
I think it says good things for your writing style that I now want to give Neon Bible another go. ;)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]amarynth
2007-12-18 07:24 pm UTC (link)
I think you'll be pleased that you did.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]deepbluemermaid
2007-12-17 11:23 pm UTC (link)
I'm pretty sure that Neon Bible is my album of the year as well. I was killing time at a bookshop on Saturday, reading the music mags, and some of them were of the same opinion. NME, however, named the Klaxons as #1; the Klaxons were a surprise choice for the Mercury Prize this year, but I haven't heard their album.

Did I tell you about seeing Arcade Fire in London last month? It was quite exhilarating to hear some of my favourite tracks live - (Antichrist Television Blues), Intervention, Keep the Cars Running, Rebellion (Lies), etc. They just have so much energy on stage, and the way they all swapped instruments was quite amazing. I gather AF are playing at the BDO next year; I wonder if they'll play anywhere else in NZ?

Other favourite albums this year: Opshop's second album, 'Second Hand Planet', which I loved on first hearing. I like Editors' album too - 'smokers outside the hospital door' is one of my top songs of the year.

And now I'm going to lose any cred I ever had, and tell you that I'm currently listening to another favourite album this year: Fall Out Boy. Yes, really. Why? Catchy tunes, great beats, some clever and interesting lyrics. It's not rocket science, but it's fun.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]cactus_cat
2007-12-18 12:54 am UTC (link)
I like your icon, despite not being a driver myself. ;)

There's much worse than Fallout Boy out there, only a slight diminishing of cred is due. Heehee!

I'd do a top 10 myself, but I don't think I've liked 10 new albums this year. It'd have to be a top 10 albums I listened to for the first time this year, instead. Lonesome Crowded West being number 1.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]amarynth
2007-12-18 07:28 pm UTC (link)
It's tempting to do a similar list myself, listing the albums I've discovered this year, but it wouldn't be very meaningful to others. I've made a conscious decision to try and listen to new music this year, after ignoring it for all of 2006. I was rather aided and abetted by releases by so many of my favourite bands (Arctic Monkeys, Editors, Arcade Fire, etc etc).

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]amarynth
2007-12-18 07:27 pm UTC (link)
Arcade Fire are darlings of music critics both professional and amateur, but it's wholly deserved. At first I thought my love for Neon Bible was a somewhat faddish product of 'shiny new album' syndrome, but it's endured. You did mention seeing them on stage when you first talked about liking them. Sadly, they're not expanding their tour beyond the BDO, although there are vague promises about returning at some stage.

An End Has A Start is also a favourite of mine, although I do hold The Back Room in slightly higher esteem - that was definitely the best album of 2005, for me. The Klaxons, I haven't heard - I've only barely heard of them.

I sort of wrote off the whole emocore movement after giving MCR an open-minded try. Perhaps Fallout Boy might reward a look. But my main priority with my music sadly remains reconstruction, not acquisition.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]mattmatt
2007-12-18 02:03 am UTC (link)
You're missing my Number One: Modest Mouse's We Were Dead Before The Ship Even Sank, a lovely album featuring Johnny Marr on guitar, guest vocals from head Shin James Mercer, and the singularly urgent, snarling vocals of Isaac Brock. This is post-modern neo-sea-shanty rock at its remarkable best. If you're not listening to it, you ought to be, unless you've tried it and have an honest opinion to the contrary, which I would totally respect (although I would love you just a little bit less for it).

And don't write Arcade Fire off just yet: their first album was, after all, titled Funerals, allegedly due to so many family members and close friends of the band dying during its composition and recording, so it's understandable if they're taking a while to come out of that. At least they can do grief and mourning without the histrionics.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]amarynth
2007-12-18 07:31 pm UTC (link)
You are of course right about Funeral. Really both albums are equally grim. The difference is that Funeral is more about personal loss, while Neon Bible is about loss on a societal level. And Funeral ends on a somewhat upbeat, if cautious, note, while Neon Bible doesn't. To misquote my review from back in March, it's as if Wyn Butler spent 2005 wandering around a cemetary, grieving lost friends and family, came to terms with his loss and left the cemetary, still sad, but quietly determined to go on, only to find that the world outside the cemetary has gone violently insane.

I have actually heard WWDBTSES, mostly thanks to Hayley, who plays it quite often. My reaction has been more one of consternation than either like or dislike - it reminds me quite a lot of MC5, which is not at all what I expected from Modest Mouse, even with Mr Marr. Did you know he almost joined Crowded House rather than Modest Mouse? I think we dodged a bullet on that one.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mattmatt
2007-12-18 08:20 pm UTC (link)
Hmm. I had to go away and look up MC5 to get that reference. It's probably appropriate, but of course I can't understand why that's a bad thing for you.

I never really got into Crowded House beyond their having had one or two nice songs back in the day: I certainly haven't heard much of their recent stuff, and am only vaguely aware that they are still (or again?) recording, thanks mostly to their outrageously-priced concert tickets being the subject of some discussion here in the office.

Also, it seems you have something against Johnny Marr?

(Way to subtly correct my mistake without drawing attention to it.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]amarynth
2007-12-18 08:56 pm UTC (link)
I've got nothing against Mr Marr - when I say he didn't join the Crowdies, it was a narrow escape on his part, since they're not that great, and their latest album is rumoured to be particularly uninspired (I haven't heard it).

Nor do I have anything against MC5 - it's just rather surprising, since word of mouth had somehow erroneously given me the idea that Modest Mouse were a rather quiet, melodic, emotive band, more along the lines of Rufus Wainwright. I will probably give their album a go, but it will have to be very good indeed to knock Neon Bible off the top of my personal 2007 pedestal.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mattmatt
2007-12-18 09:05 pm UTC (link)
Oh, right, yeah, I can see how that would be a surprise (although Word Of Mouth is, in this instance, profoundly and ineffably incorrect).

There is, to paraphrase Howard Moon, a simple truth to Modest Mouse: Isaac Brock can't really sing in tune. However. This isn't a bad thing, necessarily, because Modest Mouse are at their best when he's chanting (or shouting) lyrics like "someday you will die somehow and something's gonna steal your carbon". Emotive, certainly, but neither quiet nor melodic, at least vocally, and certainly nothing much like Rufus Wainwright.

I think what I like most about Modest Mouse is that it's abundantly clear that they are a bunch of dudes who enjoy the raw shit out of making music.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]amarynth
2007-12-19 06:44 am UTC (link)
There is, to paraphrase Howard Moon, a simple truth to Modest Mouse: Isaac Brock can't really sing in tune. However. This isn't a bad thing, necessarily, because Modest Mouse are at their best when he's chanting (or shouting) lyrics like "someday you will die somehow and something's gonna steal your carbon". Emotive, certainly, but neither quiet nor melodic, at least vocally, and certainly nothing much like Rufus Wainwright.

You see, I don't really look for tunefulness in a singer, or at least, not as much as I look for feeling, or failing that, just an interesting voice. So this is pretty much a recommendation for me. Indeed, I will take fervent shouting and clever lyrics over tunefulness any day.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]rikan_feral
2007-12-20 04:24 am UTC (link)
So. I actually gave The Arcade Fire a go, thanks to this. It's not bad. It has too many of the trappings of modern indie-pop (what exactly these are, I can't never define) for my taste, though.

In all honesty, I'm not a big fan of Grinderman. I always liked Cave *because* he was doing piano-driven doom rock, and this new, muddy-sounding album sounds very generic to me. It has good moments, but it's not consistently brilliant like so much of his other albums are.

(Reply to this)


[info]aleph_naught
2008-01-03 06:23 am UTC (link)
Of those I've listened to (10, 8, 5, 4, 3, and 1), I'd have them on my top 10 list as well, with the exception of In Rainbows, which I just haven't been able to get into despite repeated listens.

I've always been a bit funny about Radiohead.. some of their stuff makes me think they're the most brilliant band on Earth, other stuff.. well, it's good, but it just doesn't tickle my fancy at all. In Rainbows definitely falls within the latter category. It has a few good songs (Bodysnatchers is excellent), but it just doesn't seem all that catchy, at least not compared with Hail to the Thief or The Eraser.

I actually prefer An End Has a Start to The Back Room, I think, if only because it's more ambitious and has a bit more of that epic, spacious sound to it, particularly on the first couple of tracks.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]amarynth
2008-01-03 09:26 am UTC (link)
A lot of people prefer An End. I wonder if I'm just falling for 'first album deification syndrome'.

I guess I'm just the opposite about Radiohead, my favourite album of theirs is usually the last one - well, the last one or OK Computer.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(15 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…